Preventing Bone Loss in Breast Cancer Patients: Designing a Personalized Clinical Pathway in a Large-Volume Research Hospital.

BACKGROUND: We assess the impact of bone health clinical management in breast cancer (BC) patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy and design a personalized clinical pathway to reduce bone loss in an Italian research hospital. METHODS: The primary endpoint was to assess (through the process improvement organizational method) the clinical pathway that post-surgical BC patients prescribed with endocrine therapy undergo to prevent bone loss. The secondary endpoint was to design a personalized clinical pathway for a prompt implementation of guidelines, to assess and possibly prescribe antiresorptive therapy. RESULTS: During the first year of the execution of the new Diagnostic Therapeutic Assistance Pathway, a 60% increase in Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry evaluations within 30 days and a 39.5% increase in antiresorptive therapy prescription within 90 days (since the prescription of endocrine therapy) were shown, thus increasing patients' compliance. CONCLUSION: Case managers and bone health specialists in this context can improve patients' adherence to therapies and bone health, helping physicians to expand their collaboration.

Hormone Replacement Therapy in Post-Menopause Hormone-Dependent Gynecological Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the treatment of gynecological cancer have led to improvements in survival but also an increase in menopausal symptoms, especially in young women with premature iatrogenic menopause. METHODS: A narrative review was performed to clarify the possibility of prescribing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after hormone-dependent gynecological cancers (ovarian cancer [OC], cervical adenocarcinoma [AC], and endometrial cancer [EC]). RESULTS: HRT can be prescribed to patients with early-stage, grade I-II OC who experience bothersome menopausal symptoms non-responsive to alternative non-hormone therapy after optimal surgery. Caution should be exercised in administering HRT after serous borderline tumors and endometrioid OC, and HRT is not recommended in low-grade serous OC. HRT is not contraindicated in AC survivors. After surgery for EC, HRT can be prescribed in women with early-stage low-grade EC. There is not enough data to give indications to patients with advanced EC. CONCLUSIONS: HRT can be discussed with patients, evaluating the risks and benefits of hormone-dependent gynecological cancer. Counseling should be performed by gynecologic oncologists experienced in the management of these patients.

Bone mineral density and body mass composition measurements in premenopausal anorexic patients: the impact of lean body mass.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluating bone density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyzing their relationships among young anorexic women in comparison with normal-lean matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 98 normal-underweight young females were enrolled (aged more than 16 and less than 24 years). The study group included 68 anorexic patients and 30 healthy age-matched controls. The patients underwent a DXA examination to evaluate bone mineral density and body composition. Several indexes of body composition were used: the FMI (Fat Mass Index), the TLMI (Total Lean Mass Index) and the SMI (Skeletal Muscle mass Index) the last one as a marker of sarcopenia. RESULTS: According to the ISCD (International Society for Clinical Densitometry) criteria, a significantly higher percentage of anorexic patients were found to be below the expected range for age as compared to controls (P < 0.01). According to WHO criteria, 20% of the anorexic patients presented an osteoporotic T-score index at the lumbar level and 18% presented an osteoporotic T-score at the femoral level. As regards the lean body characteristics, the SMI and TLMI were significantly lower in the anorexic population (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) and 24% of the anorexic patients presented SMI values that are indicative of pre-sarcopenia. In addition, only the SMI significantly correlated with both the lumbar and the femoral BMD values. CONCLUSION: Anorexic patients have a very high risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Bone density is influenced by fat body mass and also significantly by lean body mass. Special consideration should be given to the sarcopenic condition since it is a worsening factor of bone health.

The impact of glucocorticoids on bone health and growth: endocrine and non-endocrine effects in children and young patients.

Glucocorticoids have numerous applications in short and/or long-term therapy both in pediatric and young adults, based on their significant anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Different routes of administration can be provided including topical, inhalatory and oral. Topical treatments are the first choice for many dermatologic conditions. The inhalatory form is widely used in asthma management while systemic pathologies often require oral administration. The risks for adverse effects are related to the dose and duration of therapy as well as the specific agent used. Therefore, long-term treatment has a negative impact on different metabolic systems and can lead to hypertension, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. In particular, many studies emphasize the direct and indirect effects of glucocorticoids on bone health. Glucocorticoids are the most common iatrogenic cause of osteoporosis and can alter bone development in young adults. These side effects are due to an early and transient increase in bone resorption and a decrease in bone formation. Glucocorticoid-induced changes can act on the bone multicellular unit, bone cells and intracellular signaling pathways. Chronic use can also modify bone mass though indirect endocrine and non-endocrine effects by reducing the anabolic function of sex steroids and GH/IGF-1 axis, interfere with calcium metabolism, as well as muscle atrophy and central fat accumulation. The aim of our review was to revise the available evidence on the impact of glucocorticoid treatment on bone health related to endocrine and non-endocrine effects in Young patients.

Local ultra-low-dose estriol gel treatment of vulvo-vaginal atrophy: efficacy and safety of long-term treatment.

Vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic condition affecting many postmenopausal women. Local estrogen treatment is recommended. Evaluating efficacy and safety of long-term VVA treatment with ultra-low-dose estriol gel, 120 postmenopausal VVA women were enrolled in a prospective study. They received the first cycle of 1 g/day vaginal gel containing 50 µg estriol for 3 weeks and then twice a week for 12 weeks. Moderate or severe VVA women received a second treatment cycle reaching treatment of 30 weeks. Vaginal pH measurement, subjective symptoms, and objective signs assessment of VVA, endometrial thickness and adverse events (AE) were recorded. Of the 99 women, completing the first phase, 43% experienced a complete VVA symptom relief, and 65% presented a milder VVA degree. After 30 weeks, VVA signs significantly improved (p<.01) compared with baseline and first phase results; total objective symptom evaluation including Schiller's test, flattening of folds and vaginal pH significantly improved (p<.01). At study endpoint, none of the patients had severe VVA, 93% had a positive response, 75% had a complete symptom, and sign resolution. No treatment-related endometrial AE were observed. Postmenopausal VVA long term-treatment with ultra-low-dose estriol vaginal gel is safe and effective.

Cardiovascular Risk/Benefit Profile of MHT.

Background and Objectives: Data emerging from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study point toward an association between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, post hoc subgroup analyses stratifying participants according to their age and time since menopause, have opened the way to a better understanding of the relationship between estrogen and CV risk. The aim of this review was to revise the current literature and evaluate the CV risk or benefit following administration of MHT considering several factors such as MHT timing, dose, route of administration, and formulation. Materials and Methods: An electronic databases search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS, congress abstracts, and Grey literature (Google Scholar; British Library) was performed, with the date range from each database's inception until June 2019. All the studies evaluating MHT and cardiovascular risk, including thromboembolism or stroke, were selected. Results: Timing of MHT initiation was shown to be a critical factor in CV risk assessment. In concordance with the "timing hypothesis", healthy symptomatic women who initiated MHT when aged younger than 60 years, or who were within 10 years of menopause onset, have demonstrated a reduction in both coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and all-cause mortality. In particular, MHT therapy was associated with improvement of subclinical signs of atherosclerosis. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is reduced when low doses of oral estrogen are used. Moreover, transdermal hormonal application significantly reduces CV risk compared with oral administration. MHT impact on the CV system is influenced by either factors inherent to the specific regimen, or factors inherent to the specific patient. Hence, individualization of care is necessary. Conclusion: CV risk calculation should be considered by clinicians in order to exclude patients with high CV risk, in whom MHT is contraindicated. Assessing risks and benefits in a patient-centered approach according to individual's features, health status, and personal preferences is important in order to realize a safe and effective treatment.

The impact of combined nutraceutical supplementation on quality of life and metabolic changes during the menopausal transition: a pilot randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a combined nutraceutical supplement on symptoms and early metabolic alterations during the menopausal transition. This pilot randomized study was conducted at the service for menopause disorders of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. METHODS: Ninety women in menopausal transition who attended our service with menopausal symptoms were enrolled in the study. Sixty patients, randomly assigned to the treatment group, were prescribed one daily tablet of a combined nutraceutical compound with phytoestrogen substances, vitamins, micronutrients and passion flower herbal medicine for 6 months. Thirty patients did not receive any treatment and comprised the control group. The intensity of perimenopausal symptoms was assessed by the modified Kuppermann Index (KI) at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. At baseline and at the end of the study, patients underwent a clinical evaluation, a pelvic ultrasound and analysis of blood samples. RESULTS: In the nutraceutical supplemented group, a significant reduction in menopausal symptoms was demonstrated according to the KI after 3 and 6 months of supplementation (p < 0.01). The within-group analysis of different KI parameters in the treated group showed a significant improvement in hot flushes (p < 0.001), insomnia (p < 0.01), fatigue (p < 0.01) and irritability (p < 0.01). Metabolic parameters did not change significantly in the nutraceutical supplemented group. In the control group, total cholesterol level showed a significant increase (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined nutraceutical supplementation provides an effective and safe solution for early symptoms occurring during menopausal transition.

Impact of aromatase inhibitor treatment on vertebral morphology and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment on vertebral morphology by vertebral fracture assessment in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: A clinical cross-sectional study was conducted. A group of 156 postmenopausal women with breast cancer (mean [SD] age, 60.4 [10.1] y; mean [SD] time since menopause, 11.7 [9.2] y) was included in the study. Eighty-two women received AI treatment, whereas 74 women did not. Women underwent extensive medical history check and risk factor assessment together with vertebral morphology and bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. RESULTS: In the studied population, the prevalence of vertebral fractures identified by vertebral fracture assessment was 16.6%. Multivariate analysis showed that AI treatment was significantly associated with vertebral fractures (adjusted P < 0.04). Women receiving AI treatment had a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures than women not treated with AIs (25.6% vs. 4%). The risk of vertebral fractures in women treated with AIs was significantly higher than in non-AI-treated women (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; P < 0.005). Vertebral fractures of the highest grade were identified at the lumbar spine. Women treated with AIs had a significantly lower BMD than women not treated with AIs (P < 0.01). Reduction of BMD was significantly associated with length of therapy, whereas there was no association between length of treatment and risk of vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: AI treatment severely impacts vertebral morphology. Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fractures in women treated with AIs.